FindGreatLawyers.com is a unique service. We are Illinois attorneys who since 2001 have focused our practice on helping people...

Illinois Lawyer Referrals and Legal Guidance

Archive for July, 2011

Employers aren’t allowed to do credit checks in Illinois

Friday, July 29th, 2011

Illinois law prohibits job discrimination based on a person’s credit. Under this law, which was new this year, employers must stop running credit checks on job applicants (as well as employees), something that many of them were in the habit of doing. This means that an employer cannot make hiring, firing, promotion or benefit decisions based on a person’s credit history.

If you have had financial trouble, and as a result ruined your credit, an employer can’t hold it against you. In fact, they shouldn’t even be accessing that information at all. Supporters of the law say that it prevents people from getting caught in a vicious cycle of unemployment and bad credit.

As with any law, there are exceptions. For example, credit checks on bank employees are allowed, as well as other industries and positions where it’s considered relevant. But for most people – employees and applicants – credit history is off limits.

For more information on employment discrimination and related laws, click here.

Illinois manslaughter laws

Thursday, July 28th, 2011

You might have heard the recent news story about a guy who agreed to get punched at a party in Crest Hill. He accepted $5 in exchange for letting a woman punch him in the face. She hit him, and it killed him. Apparently, a vein or artery ruptured in his neck. It was a freak accident (there were reports that a congenital defect was a factor), and now the woman who punched him is facing criminal charges.

My question is: Was this really a crime? It was a dumb thing to do, and certainly a tragedy, but I’m not sure this woman committed a crime. The main reason I feel this way is because the victim consented. He didn’t consent to being killed, obviously, but that wasn’t her intent. Apparently, this 21-year-old woman had played this party game before but wasn’t a trained fighter or anything.

On the other hand, one of the reasons for prosecution and punishment is to deter others. Thinking about it that way, putting this woman through the system might serve a purpose. And I do think we should be held responsible for our actions and not be able to say “Oh I didn’t mean to do that” and be let off the hook. No one forced her to punch this guy. He made a dumb choice, but she did, as well.

There also was a third person involved – a man who suggested the game in the first place and who apparently offered up the cash. The 21-year-old woman was charged with battery and felony reckless conduct. The man who proposed the punch was charged with reckless conduct, as well. The woman’s attorneys argued that the charges should be dropped because the punch was consensual and her actions were not reckless. The judge in the case rejected the motion to dismiss, so the case against her will go forward.

It’s an interesting case, legally speaking. Does this woman deserve to be prosecuted? Or is it a waste of time for our already overcrowded justice system?

5 tips for medical malpractice cases.

Wednesday, July 27th, 2011

Lawsuits for medical malpractice are among the most complex types of cases.  Here are five important things to keep in mind if you have been injured as a result of a medical mistake.

1.  Your injury:  Medical malpractice cases in Illinois compensate you for the harm that was actually caused by the mistake that happened.  There can be many frustrating events during the course of medical treatment, and incidents involving serious mistakes by doctors or hospitals.  If you were fortunate enough that you didn’t suffer a great injury as a result, then you would not likely have a case for medical malpractice.

Some examples of the harm suffered from a medical mistake are:  extra medical bills, lost wages from missing work, pain and suffering, and other impacts on your life that resulted from the mishap.  Also, malpractice cases can be very expensive to pursue, so if the damages you could recover aren’t considerably higher than what it costs to bring the case to trial, it may not be worth going forward.

2.  The negligence:  To qualify as “malpractice,” a medical mistake has to be more than just a bad decision, an error in judgment, or a bad result.  There is risk involved in all medical procedures, and the medical providers are given the leeway to make reasonable mistakes and to have patients’ results not turn out well.

The standard that medical professionals are held to for medical malpractice cases is that of a reasonable standard of care in their particular area of practice.  An expert will need to testify about the reasonable standard that the defendant should have met, and that he or she did not meet that standard in treating you, and was therefore negligent.   The negligence also needs to have resulted in your injury.

3.  Time to bring the case:  There is a time limitations period during which you have to bring your medical malpractice case, or else you may lose your right to bring it (statute of limitations period).  Generally in Illinois, the time limit to bring your case is two years from the date of your injury.  But if you were not aware of your injury right away or that there was negligence involved, you have two years starting from the date that you knew or should have known about it–but not longer than four years from the injury date.

Where the malpractice resulted in death, the usual time limit for filing the case for wrongful death is two years from the date of death.  Where minors are injured by a medical malpractice, they have eight years from the date of the injury to file their case, but not to extend past their 22nd birthday.

Some limitations periods are longer where the person injured is mentally incompetent.  And some limitations periods are shorter, depending upon who the defendant is.   In order to be sure you don’t miss your chance to bring your case, it’s important to talk to a lawyer about this.

4.  What will the case cost? Generally, attorneys handle medical malpractice cases on a contingent fee basis.  This means that you will not have to pay your attorney for the hourly cost for representing you.  The attorney does not get paid unless you recover money, and then is paid in a percentage of that amount.

There are other expenses involved in bringing lawsuits.  In medical malpractice cases, there are fees for hiring experts and having them testify for you.  These costs are usually advanced by the lawyer, and then reimbursed from the money you are awarded when you win your case.

5. How much is the case worth? Predicting how much a case is worth is difficult, because the facts of each case are unique, and can be looked at differently by different juries.

The types of damages you can ask for in medical malpractice cases are:  economic—your actual monetary losses resulting from the injury; and non-economic—your pain and suffering and other less tangible measures.  The economic damages can be proven by medical bills and other specific evidence.  Though estimating lost wages for not being able to work can require speculation.  Non-economic damages are even trickier, and often require expert testimony to prove.  It is hard to put an exact dollar amount on things like pain and the loss of the companionship of a loved one.

Illegal bullying on the job in Illinois

Tuesday, July 26th, 2011

You might think your boss is a jerk, but this story is a nightmare. A young CVS worker was held against his will in a back storage room and threatened and bullied into confessing to internal theft. A store manager and an imposing loss prevention officer interrogated him, saying that they had a video showing that he stole $15,000 worth of merchandise over two years. Of course he wasn’t allowed to see the video, nor was he allowed to call anyone, go to the bathroom or get a drink of water during the three-hour session.

Then the threats started. They said he would go to jail. And what’s worse, they told him that if he didn’t sign a confession, his U.S. citizenship (he is a Mexican immigrant) would be revoked, and so would his mother’s. Despite repeatedly and specifically denying he did this, he was eventually forced to sign the confession. And not surprisingly, with theft on his record, he had trouble finding another job.

I wish this was an isolated event. (Actually, I wish it hadn’t happened at all to this young man.) However, there are similar stories, in Chicago and throughout the country, of employees getting bullied into admitting theft or similar wrongdoing. It could happen to you, your spouse/partner, or your children.

With employment rates up, and jobs hard to find, there may be less of an incentive to treat workers fairly. After all, if they quit, you can easily find a replacement among the thousands of people looking for work. What’s different in this case is that this employee filed a lawsuit. The lawsuit was filed in Cook County, and the multiple claims include libel, forced imprisonment, defamation, intentional emotional distress, and civil conspiracy.

Most states have at-will employment laws, meaning that employees who don’t have a contract can be fired for any reason, or no reason at all. But just because that law favors employers, doesn’t mean they can bully employees in an illegal way. Hopefully, this lawsuit sends a message.

Illinois power of attorney overview

Monday, July 25th, 2011

There are three relatively simple steps that everyone can take to help give themselves a voice when they become unable to speak for themselves.  While you are still able to make decisions for yourself, you can execute documents that give others power and instruction to carry out your wishes for your finances, your health care, and your medical end-of life decisions when you cannot.

A Power of Attorney for Property gives to someone else as your agent, the power to make decisions regarding your financial affairs.  The agent you choose will act on your behalf when you are incapacitated, and can’t act for yourself.  If you choose to leave it open, the power can last until your death.  But at any time, as long as you are still well enough to make decisions for yourself, the power of attorney can be amended.

When you’re filling out the power of attorney form, you can consider what and how much authority you want to give.  You can include the power over your bank accounts, real estate, stocks, retirement plans, and other personal property. You can give broad powers or limited powers with regard to your property.

However you choose to execute the power of attorney for property, by doing this your financial affairs will be taken care of according to your wishes, and by the person you trust the most to carry out those wishes, when you can’t act for yourself.

A Power of Attorney for Healthcare gives authority to an agent to make medical decisions on your behalf, when you are incapacitated and can’t exercise your own decision-making power.  By giving someone your power of attorney over your healthcare decisions, you are ensuring these important decisions won’t be decided by a battle among your loved ones or by the courts.

You can specify that you are giving the power to your agent to consent to or to withdraw treatment for any medical condition, and to admit or discharge you from hospitals and other healthcare facilities.

The person to whom you give your healthcare power of attorney should be someone very trusted by you who knows your wishes and desires, and who is not afraid to carry them out.  If left open, the power will last until your death, but can always be amended as long as you are capable of executing the change.

Along with the healthcare power of attorney is a Living Will.  This document is not a power given to a particular person, but rather a recording in a document of what your wishes are regarding end-of-life decisions.  These medical decisions can be the hardest for loved ones to face, and having a living will helps you to have power to choose, and helps them to know what your wishes are.

Typically the living will is used when someone is terminally ill and being sustained on life support.  If it is clear that death is imminent, and the patient does not want any extraordinary measures used to delay the inevitable, then having a living will directs the medical professionals to carry out those wishes.

In most cases these documents can be filled out without an attorney, and are fairly straightforward.  Though it’s not something anyone enjoys thinking about, it’s better to have a solid plan in place while you’re still physically and mentally able to do it.  You empower yourself in the future by granting others the power to act for you when you need it most.

Resolving issues without a trial—bringing motions in Illinois courts.

Friday, July 22nd, 2011

After a lawsuit has been filed, there are procedures called “motions” that are available to help decide some or all of the issues in the case without going to trial.  Sometimes the issues can even be decided at the beginning, before others steps have been taken.  Once a motion has been brought, and the other side has a chance to respond in writing, both can make their arguments to the judge, who then makes a decision.

There are three major kinds of motions which resolve issues before trial.  Each has its own function and rules.  And for each, the result can range from ending the whole case permanently, to ending a part of the case temporarily until corrections can be made.

First, there is a motion to dismiss part or all of the complaint, based on some defect that is actually in the complaint itself.  The motion points out a legal problem with what has been alleged in the complaint, and asks the court to dismiss it as unwinnable.  Basically it is saying that even if all the facts in the complaint are assumed to be true, the law would not support this claim, and therefore it should be dismissed.

Sometimes such a motion points out problems with the case that cannot be fixed.  If there is no other way to set out the case that would solve the legal problem, then the case is dismissed permanently.  Otherwise, there is a chance to try to amend the complaint to cure the defect.

Another motion to dismiss at the early stages of the case looks at not just the complaint, but the facts surrounding the issues in the case as well.  This type of motions argues that even if the legal issues could seem fine with the complaint, there is another matter that warrants dismissing some or all of the complaint.  Written statements that are given under oath (affidavits) can be included with the motion to present to the court the full picture.

There are specific defects or defenses that these motions are directed at.  For example, if the complaint was filed too late, past the period allowed for filing a case, then it could be dismissed.  Also, if there is some other issue or defense that is recognized by law as defeating the claim, then the court can decide that the claim should be dismissed.  Sometimes, for example, it could look like a proper claim, until the court sees that there was an agreement between the two that would prevent that type of claim.

Just like the other motion to dismiss, sometimes there is a second chance to fix what is wrong, but sometimes there could be no other way to bring the claim that would fix the problem.

Lastly, either side can bring a motion for summary judgment, which asks the court to decide some or all of the claims in the lawsuit without a trial.  If you’re the plaintiff, you are arguing to the court that the facts of the case aren’t in question, and you should win on the law.  If you are the defendant, you are similarly saying that even with the facts that are there, there is no legal basis for the case.

Documents and affidavits that support your arguments can be included in your motion.  The judge will look at all of the pleadings, along with your arguments and other documents, and decide if there is any factual issue that needs a trial.  If not, then a decision can be made based on the law, without going to trial.

All of the case or just part of it can be decided by summary judgment.  Sometimes, for example, the issue of legal responsibility for an accident is decided, and only a trial is had to decide how much money in damages the plaintiff may be allowed.

These motions can be complicated, but a good lawyer can use them, or defend against them effectively, and save you time and money going through a long trial on all of the issues of the case.

Do you let your kids’ friends drink at your house

Thursday, July 21st, 2011

If you have a child graduating from high school this spring, you might be hosting a party, or allowing them to host one at your house. The issue of underage drinking may come up. Aside from the obvious dangers, there could be legal implications for you, the adult in charge.


The Illinois Supreme Court recently heard the case against a Deerfield couple whose son had a party, with alcohol, at their home. Their son’s friend drank, got behind the wheel and hit a tree down the street. He was killed in the accident and his parents sued Sarah and Jeffrey Hutsell for hosting the party. The case went all the way to the state Supreme Court, which found that the Hutsells were not liable because they didn’t have a duty to prevent underage drinking in the circumstances of this particular case.


Even though they don’t have to pay damages for wrongful death, they were found guilty of criminal charges back in 2007 after the accident. The criminal charges were for allowing underage drinking in their home, endangering a child and obstruction of justice (for cleaning up after the party). Mr. Hutsell served a short time in jail. It’s not uncommon for a civil lawsuit to have a different outcome than the criminal charges involving the same incident.


Because each case is different, Supreme Court’s ruling doesn’t mean that you’re off the hook for a civil lawsuit if a teen gets hurt (or hurts someone else) after drinking at your house. Even if the underage drinker leaves your house, drives to the next town, and then gets in an accident, you can be sued by their parents or by anyone they injured as a result of their intoxication.


I realize these parties happen all the time. Some parents would rather have their child drink at home than at someone else’s house. Some parents don’t think it’s a big deal. Whatever the reason, it’s just not worth the risk, both in terms of safety for the kids, and legal consequences for the parents. Even though the Hutsells succeeded in their case, it’s hardly a win.


FindGreatLawyers.com