FindGreatLawyers.com is a unique service. We are Illinois attorneys who since 2001 have focused our practice on helping people...

Illinois Lawyer Referrals and Legal Guidance

Archive for June, 2011

Ten legal documents you should know about

Tuesday, June 21st, 2011

Here are ten forms and/or documents worth knowing about. Some are fairly straightforward, while others require the experience of an attorney (or at least it’s highly recommended). We try to explain things in a way that makes sense, without using legalese, but always let us know if you have any questions.

  1. Affidavit. An affidavit is a sworn statement. It’s like testifying in court, except on paper. When you sign an affidavit, you are swearing, under oath, that the statement is true and accurate.
  2. Answer. An answer is a response to a lawsuit. A plaintiff sues someone by filing a complaint, or lawsuit, in court. Then, the defendant has a certain amount of time to respond by filing an answer. There are rules for what must be included in an answer.
  3. Judgment. A judgment is the decision by a judge and often an order instructing someone to do something, or not do something. For example, it might order one party to pay damages to the other, or declare the rightful owner in a property dispute.
  4. Letter of intent. A letter of intent is often used in anticipation of a large transaction, such as when one business is buying another. A letter doesn’t guarantee that the deal will go through, but it shows that the parties are serious. It might include a timeline or other details.
  5. Notice of appeal. If you lose in court, you have the right to appeal in most cases. However, there are rules and procedures that need to be followed. One of the first is filing a notice of appeal. It’s not necessarily a complicated document, but it must be filed by a certain deadline or you lose your chance to bring the appeal.
  6. Promissory note. A promissory note is a promise to pay. It states who owes whom, how much, and when and how it will be paid. Promissory notes can be enforced, meaning if someone doesn’t hold up their end of the bargain, they can be sued.
  7. Small estate affidavit. As mentioned above, an affidavit is a sworn statement. In this situation, it’s used to establish that an estate is small enough to avoid probate. Small estates do not have to go though as intense of a process as larger estates, and the affidavit shows the court that it falls into this category.
  8. Subpoena. A subpoena requires someone to appear in court. They are routinely used to call witnesses in to testify. Some subpoenas require a person to produce certain documents. This type is called a subpoena duces tecum.
  9. Waiver. When you sign a waiver, you are signing away rights. Usually, it’s your right to sue. In some cases, these documents aren’t valid, meaning you can still sue despite signing one. For example, if you sign a waiver before participating in a dangerous activity, you can still sue if you were injured because of someone’s negligence.
  10. Will. Most people know what a will is, but might not know that there are legal requirements. It must be written, signed by the person making the will, and signed by two witnesses. The person must be 18 years old and of sound mind. We caution against form wills you find online. Courts won’t follow an invalid will; your property will be distributed as if you didn’t have a will at all.

If you have a question about a legal term or document you don’t see here, check our legal dictionary.

Multiple traffic tickets are more serious for underage drivers

Monday, June 20th, 2011

Go to fullsize image

Speeding tickets and other moving violations pose a problem for any driver. If you are a young driver – under 21 – the laws are stricter. You need to be concerned about keeping your driving privileges, not increasing your insurance rates, and keeping your record clean.

If you get multiple violations, the state can suspend your license and your driving privileges. For someone 21 or older, these consequences kick in when you get more than three violations in a year. For a driver who is under 21, the state will suspend your license if you get more than two violations in 24 months. So after a first ticket, you have to be very careful.

You may not need an attorney for a first violation, especially if you have the option of traffic school. However, it never hurts to consult with a traffic defense attorney to see what your options are. Just pleading guilty (which is what you’re doing when you simply pay the fine), might seem easiest, but then it’s on your record and you’re that much closer to a license suspension. If you get a second violation and you’re under 21, we almost always recommend talking to a lawyer.

When seeking out a traffic defense attorney, look for someone who does mostly traffic cases and appears in traffic court many days out of the week. In our opinion, these are the most experienced attorneys for a traffic case, and the ones most likely to get you a positive outcome. Knowing the other attorneys, judges and clerks in the local traffic court can give your attorney – and you – an advantage. So start local and focus on experience.

Accidents at Illinois amusement parks

Friday, June 17th, 2011

From kiddie carnival rides for young children to high-climbing roller coasters for teens, most kids are enticed by the thrill of the ride.  And with spring in the air it’s only a matter of time before amusement parks and local fairs begin operating again.  But what do we know about the safety of these rides, before we send our children on them?

In a recent tragic incident in Illinois, a three-year-old boy fell from a rollercoaster at an indoor children’s amusement park.  He apparently was able to get free from the safety bar and slip out of the ride, falling to his death. It is believed that the boy met the height requirements for the ride, but was somehow able to come free from the ride’s restraint.

Though it is still too early to know many of the details of how this accident happened, it is important to look at what protections there are to see that our children are safe when they are riding amusement rides.

The Illinois Department of Labor (IDOL) is our first line of safety for amusement rides and attractions.  Before they can operate initially, rides and attractions must be inspected and approved by the IDOL for a permit, and then annually after that.  In addition to safety inspection of the equipment, the permit requires documentation that the workers have been properly screened and trained according to the IDOL requirements.

It’s not just typical rollercoaster and ferris wheel types of rides that are required to have permits from the IDOL.  Other attractions such as climbing walls, haunted houses, and inflatables are also subject to the yearly inspections.  There are both civil and criminal penalties involved for failing to have a proper permit for a ride, and for not complying with orders from the IDOL.

For the young boy who fell from the rollercoaster, these safety requirements alone did not provide enough protection.   The ride had reportedly been inspected, and had a proper permit, and the height restrictions were met.  So it is important to look at what else we can do to give our children an extra measure of safety protection.

The IDOL provides us with some additional guidelines for amusement park safety, including:

  • checking for current permit stickers on all rides and attractions your children will be going on;
  • making ourselves aware of all riding restrictions, such as height and age;
  • explaining to our children why it is dangerous to stand up or loosen the restraints on a ride—all seatbelts and restraints must be used properly and not tampered with;
  • explaining to our children the importance of keeping their hands and feet inside the ride, and holding on to any handles that are provided; and
  • explaining to our children the importance of following other instructions of the ride operators, including staying seated until the ride is completely stopped.

Importantly, also, it is discouraged to try to pressure anyone to go on a ride if he or she is afraid.  We all want our children to have fun and unique life experiences, but it is also important to stay safe and be vigilant.  If something doesn’t seem right about a ride operator or equipment, don’t take a chance.  Unsafe conditions on rides and amusement attractions can be reported to the IDOL.

Would Mary Poppins post this?

Thursday, June 16th, 2011

When we drop our children off at school each morning we are placing our highest trust in the professionals who will care for them throughout the day.  So when a mom found that her daughter had been publicly mocked because of a teacher’s actions, she had every reason to feel shocked and betrayed.

A second grade girl arrived at her Chicago public school on picture day with a hairstyle she had chosen, which included candy affixed to her braids.  For the child, it was likely a colorful and joyful expression of personal “taste,” but for others, unfortunately, it was a source of amusement.

Apparently, according to the mother, the girl’s teacher at school asked her if she could take her picture with her cell phone camera, without mentioning it would be posted.  The picture ended up on the teacher’s Facebook page, with a caption that seemed to mock the hairdo.  This caption was followed by other “friends’” posts that ridiculed the child’s choice of hairstyle.

The mother has filed a lawsuit in Cook County Court against the teacher.  She is claiming that the teacher’s actions caused her daughter “emotional distress.”  I don’t think many would dispute that the child’s teacher acted inappropriately.  And the school district may have some action to address this conduct.  But should the teacher and the school have to pay money to compensate the child for what she suffered from the incident?

In a lawsuit for emotional distress, you have to show that the defendant did something that was extreme and outrageous, and that the defendant knew or should have known that what he or she did would cause severe emotional distress. Also, the action must have actually caused severe emotional distress.

In many cases, if someone allows you to take their picture, posting it on a social media site would not seem particularly outrageous.  The reality of our media-laden world today is that we should all be aware that pictures of us could end up in places we didn’t choose.  And once those pictures are out there, anyone with an internet connection is free to post a comment.

However this case involved a young child, and an adult who was in a position of trust.  When children are away from their parents at school, the teacher becomes the surrogate protector of the student.  When the teacher asked if she could take the child’s picture, the girl had no reason to believe that anything inappropriate would or could come of it.  She could not appreciate the risk she was taking in consenting to have her picture taken.

The teacher’s conduct then can be looked at as far more outrageous than in the typical “photo op” situation.  She should have known that by posting that picture with a comical caption, she was opening the door to unflattering public comment about her student.  Teachers are entitled to their private lives and their private humor, but Facebook is anything but private.

A potential difficulty with this case, though, is whether the child suffered the kind of emotional harm that the law is meant to address.  In a situation like this, a child could lose faith and confidence in teachers and other trusted adults.  A child could feel humiliated and embarrassed to go to school.  But whether the emotional impact is severe enough to win a lawsuit is another question.

Tips on basic information on orders of protection in Illinois

Wednesday, June 15th, 2011

Every Wednesday we provide five legal tips. Today’s tips are on orders of protection in Illinois (also known as restraining orders).

  1. Criminal. There are two main types of orders of protection in Illinois. The first is a criminal order of protection, obtained from a criminal court judge. You should seek out this type of restraining order if your situation has involved the police or if you intend to press charges.
  2. Civil. An order of protection should be sought in civil court if the police have not been involved – no arrests, police reports, charges, etc. Family law cases are a common example, where one parent wants an order of protection regarding child custody or visitation. The person seeking a civil order of protection will need to show a history of abuse.
  3. Parties. You can’t get an order of protection against just anyone. They are usually issued against someone you live with, a family member, or someone you have children with or are dating.
  4. Hearing. A judge will decide whether to issue an order of protection after a hearing. If one is being sought against you, it’s a good idea to get an attorney to defend you. Emergency orders of protection are available, as well.
  5. Violations. Violating an order of protection is a Class A misdemeanor, punishable by fines and up to a year in jail. For a defendant with prior offenses, violating an order of protection can be a felony. It’s important to obey the order while it’s in place, even if you and the other person have reconciled.

Illinois copyright and idea theft cases

Tuesday, June 14th, 2011

We feel protective of our ideas, yet the law doesn’t always feel the same. The law actually allows people to rip off ideas in many situations. It’s supposed to be for the greater good – sharing ideas, building on them, innovating, etc. If you mention an idea to a coworker and they use it, they probably haven’t done anything wrong, legally speaking.

However, there are some situations where you can protect an idea as your own.

One instance is when you have a copyright on a work. Although ideas themselves are not copyrightable, when you put the idea on paper, or film, or some other medium, it can become protected. If someone copies the work, you can sue for copyright infringement. Copyright cases often come down to how similar the two works are. You have to prove that there is a substantial similarity between your original and the alleged copy.  This is a gray area and depends on the facts of each case. For example, if you want to write a mystery novel, you’re probably safe using some of the common, or generic, elements of this type of story. Think about the books you’ve read. Often, there are similar elements, generic plot twists, etc. If these were protectable, writers would be severely limited in what they could write. On the other end, each work has specific things that make it different. The court usually focuses on these details, as well as the combination of generic elements, in order to determine whether there is a substantial similarity.

Another instance where the law protects ideas is when you are submitting your work to try and sell it. You can’t do this without revealing your idea, so the law gives you some recourse against a person or corporation who rejects your idea and then later uses it anyway without paying for it. This isn’t a copyright case, but rather a contract case. And it’s not automatic. You need to prove that there was an agreement between you and whoever looked at your work. It doesn’t have to be in writing, but it needs to be clear that there was an expectation of payment for use of the idea, and that the defendant was aware of the expectation when they accepted the submission. You also have to prove that the defendant received your work. If you never had any contact, there can’t be a contract.

This area of law isn’t only for writers and those in the entertainment industry. Businesses can be affected, as well. If you are in the business of accepting submissions of any kind, it’s a good idea to take precautions against a possible idea theft lawsuit. You can require a contract of your own, refuse to accept submissions, etc. If you are submitting work, you need to be clear about your expectations.

If you feel that your work has been wrongfully copied, you may have an infringement case. Each situation is different and some uses of your work may be allowed, such as fair use for educational purposes. A copyright attorney can help you sort through the details and determine whether you have a case worth pursuing.

Right to sue letter

Monday, June 13th, 2011

If you think you have been discriminated against at work, and you want to sue your employer, you need to first go through the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). This government agency investigates claims of discrimination and then gives employees the green light to file a lawsuit. The green light is in the form of a letter called a “Notice of Right to Sue.”

Getting a right-to-sue letter is not difficult, although it can take some time. The EEOC is slammed with cases. However, after a certain amount of time passes, you can request a notice of right to sue even if the EEOC hasn’t finished their investigation. So the question isn’t whether you’ll get the right to sue. The question is what will happen after you get your letter. It puts you on the clock and creates a strict deadline for a lawsuit. You only have 90 days. That is a very short time when it comes to preparing a lawsuit.  We recommend hiring a lawyer ahead of time so you have someone in place when your letter comes.

Keep in mind that there are many unethical and immoral things an employer can do that aren’t illegal. For example, you can be fired for no reason. You can be fired because your boss doesn’t like your attitude, or your shirt, or because you were late one time. This is true even if you’ve worked for the company for years and never had a single mark against you. Illinois follows the rule of at-will employment, meaning an employer doesn’t have an obligation to keep you (unless you have a contract that says otherwise).

Of course there are things that an employer cannot do, such as make decisions about hiring/firing/promotions/benefits based on race, sex, religion, age, disability, etc. It is illegal to discriminate based on these things, but the problem is proving it. The key is having evidence in the form of witnesses, e-mails or other documentation that show what you’re claiming. Otherwise, it’s your word against theirs. Even if you know in your heart that you were fired illegally, your employer likely has a legal reason down on paper that explains your termination. It’s not right, but that’s the reality.

Government agencies get a lot of criticism for taking long and doing nothing. The EEOC does take long, but you can benefit from their initial investigation. They can build a case by interviewing people to determine if what happened to you was legal or not, which is the major roadblock in many cases. You need evidence, and the EEOC can be a great resource for it.


FindGreatLawyers.com