FindGreatLawyers.com is a unique service. We are Illinois attorneys who since 2001 have focused our practice on helping people...

Illinois Lawyer Referrals and Legal Guidance

Archive for May, 2011

Chicago Defamation Attorney: Slander Law in Illinois

Tuesday, May 31st, 2011

Defamation is when one party harms the reputation of another with a statement – either spoken or written. Spoken defamation is called slander; written defamation is called libel. In order to win a case for defamation, you have to prove that the statement was false, that a third party heard or read the statement, that the defendant was negligent and that you were harmed.

People are defamed all the time, yet lawsuits are rare. Proving damages is perhaps the biggest hurdle. It’s hard to put a price on a damaged reputation. So, in addition to proving injury to your reputation, you generally need to prove actual harm (losing your job, or losing customers to your business). And a small amount of damages isn’t worth a lawsuit. In order to have the type of loss worthy of a lawsuit, the defamation probably needs to be wide spread, meaning a lot of people heard or read the negative statement.

Attorneys tend to be picky when taking these cases because the majority aren’t worth much, if anything. A libel or slander lawsuit is an injury lawsuit, and like most injury cases, attorneys take them on a contingency basis. They don’t get a fee unless you win, so the possible recovery has to be worth the work. And the recovery has to be collectible. If the defendant doesn’t have any money or assets, you (and your attorney) won’t get paid. What this means is that most defamation cases that go anywhere are against corporations that can afford to pay damages or a settlement. It’s probably not worth suing a neighbor who spreads rumors about you in the neighborhood.

So you need widespread, tangible harm, against a party that has the ability to pay. And it helps if the defamation was written and you have the proof. There are other hurdles to consider, as well. Freedom of speech is a big one. The law does not punish people for speaking or writing something just because it hurts someone else. There are a many situations where negative commentary is allowed. For example, if the statement was true, it’s not defamation. Opinion also isn’t defamation. If someone writes a negative review of a business online, giving their opinion, it’s usually not defamatory (unless it includes false statements that aren’t opinion, like “the restaurant is infested with rats”).

The statute of limitations for defamation cases in Illinois is one year from when the libel or slander occurred. This is a fairly short deadline, so if you are wondering whether you have a case worth pursuing, feel free to call for our opinion or to get a referral to an experienced Illinois defamation attorney.

Golfer not responsible for hitting woman in the head

Monday, May 30th, 2011

There have been a few cases against golfers in the news in recent memory. I just read a follow-up article about the DuPage County case, where a woman was hit in the head by a golf ball as she was gardening in her back yard (which was on a golf course). She sued the golfer and the country club. The case against the club reportedly settled for $30,000. The judge dismissed the case against the golfer, saying he wasn’t playing the game negligently. The law in Illinois doesn’t hold someone responsible for simply hitting a bad shot.

I’d say this is a fairly typical outcome. At least it’s more typical than a person getting a lot of money for a minor injury, which is what people often believe. These are fairly interesting stories to read, but not many readers stay interested. People are more likely to read the original reports (that mention a big lawsuit) than the follow up article, if there is one.

The fact that this lawsuit was dismissed isn’t huge news, but it’s a good example of a regular outcome. People who get injured usually don’t hit the jackpot with a lawsuit. Many are settled for relatively small amounts outside of court. Some are dismissed, or dropped.

You need a pretty significant injury, and someone acting negligently, to win a “big” lawsuit. And you need to be able to collect from the negligent person to even make it worthwhile. There are a lot of factors that come together to make one of those “million dollar lawsuits.” And frankly, it doesn’t happen that often.

Seven Things to Look for in an Injury Attorney

Friday, May 27th, 2011
  1. A focused practice. It’s almost always a safer bet to hire an attorney who focuses their practice in the specific area of law your case involves. This way, you can be more certain that they have the experience to help you.
  2. Significant experience. An attorney who has more experience in a certain area of law is more likely to be able to handle your case aggressively and efficiently. They will know the pitfalls from past experience and won’t be getting their feet wet with your case.
  3. Location. This may or may not matter, depending on the type of case you have. If your case is extremely complex or high profile, we’ll likely recommend a big city attorney. Bigger firms have more resources. On the other hand, for an accident without severe injuries or a large corporate defendant, you may want to hire someone local who knows the judges and the other attorneys in the area. It may work to your advantage.
  4. Fees. Almost all injury attorneys charge on a contingency basis, meaning that they don’t get paid unless and until you win (or settle). These attorneys should cover your costs upfront (court filing fees, etc.). If they’re trying to charge you for every little thing, as well as take a fee at the end, you can probably do better.
  5. Personality. When you meet with a potential attorney, interview them and get a sense of their personality. If it clashes with yours, you may want to keep looking. Better to do this at the outset than wait until a problem develops and you have to look for another attorney. Switching mid-case is allowed but not necessarily easy.
  6. Reputation. An attorney with a good reputation among judges, colleagues and clients is a good thing to look for. It’s not always easy to find this out, but you can read reviews, ask attorneys if you know any, and even talk to past clients to get a feel for an attorney’s reputation.
  7. Past success. If an attorney has had past success in your type of case, it’s a good sign that they know what they’re doing. It’s not a guarantee, but they must have done something right in those other cases. Be sure to ask them about how they’ve handled cases similar to yours and what the outcomes were.

Signing a release—what are you giving up?

Thursday, May 26th, 2011

More and more these days, businesses are asking us for our signature on a document before we can participate in some activity they run.  These documents are releases, and purport to have us give up our rights to sue them if we get hurt during the activity.  Often when we’re handed these papers to sign, we’re in a hurry, and it’s either sign, or don’t do what we went there to do.  So what does it mean?

These kinds of releases are actually legally binding contracts.  You’re telling them that if they let you participate, you won’t sue them if certain types of things happen.  You’re agreeing that there are risks involved in what you’re about to do, and you are responsible for those risks, not the business.

Even though it doesn’t feel like we’re actually entering into a contract, we are if we sign the document.  And often times, hopeful participants sign away their rights without even reading what they’re signing.  This too, is still a contract.

In Illinois, releases like these are generally upheld, and found by the courts to prevent a lawsuit where someone was later injured.  There are some limitations, however, to try to ensure fairness for all.  Releases will often not be allowed to prevent a lawsuit in these circumstances:

  • you were injured because the business acted in a way that was intentional or reckless;
  • to have a release would be unfair:  for example, where it would violate a relationship between you and the business or violate a public policy;
  • the language of the release is not clear and specific enough to give you notice about the types of dangers you could experience, or to let you know the range of activities or circumstances included;
  • there was fraud or deception involved in getting you to sign the release.

If you are going to relieve someone else of their duty of care towards you by signing a release, the document should be fair and clear.  You should know what you are getting into, and be able to walk away if you don’t want to sign.

Knowing that you understand your right not to sign and can walk away may be fine in theory.  But in practice, when you are waiting to participate in an activity or event, and you are being handed a legal document and told to sign first, it can feel like there isn’t much choice.  You do have the right to ask questions, and find out what you are giving up—just as you would likely do with any other legal document you sign.

You don’t always need an attorney

Wednesday, May 25th, 2011

Every Wednesday we provide five tips about an area of Illinois law. Here are five things you don’t need to hire an attorney to handle, generally speaking.

  1. Social Security. If you are filing for social security benefits, go ahead and try it on your own. If your application is denied, then talk to an attorney about the next steps you can take to ensure that you get the benefits you’re entitled to.
  2. Small Debts. If you’re trying to collect a few hundred dollars you loaned to a friend, or even a few thousand, you can handle it in small claims court.
  3. Car Accidents. If you are in a minor accident, contact your insurance company. If the accident was your fault, and you get sued, it’s their job to defend you.
  4. Speeding Tickets. If it’s your first moving violation in recent history, you can deal with it without an attorney. If you want to request a court date and fight the ticket, it’s a good idea to see an attorney about that. Also, if you are currently on supervision when you get the ticket, or if you have multiple violations in a short time, talk to an attorney to protect your driving privileges.
  5. Landlord Disputes. If you have a dispute with your landlord over a security deposit, or something similar, try working it out by writing a letter. You may even have to go to small claims court. There are organizations in many cities that assist renters with these issues. Hiring an attorney isn’t usually worth it because it would likely cost more than the amount you’re trying to collect.

Filing a Complaint against a Professional in Illinois

Tuesday, May 24th, 2011

Sometimes when you are wronged, filing a lawsuit isn’t the answer. Or at least it’s not the best answer. A good example is when a professional is dishonest or incompetent. Your doctor gives you terrible advice, or an attorney goes against your wishes when handling your case. We even hear cases of verbal abuse. In these situations, you haven’t been harmed to the point where you lost a ton of money or suffered a serious or lasting injury. So a lawsuit usually isn’t a good option.

However, just letting it go may not be an option, either. You’re turning to these people for help, and you’re paying them for their work. If you have an issue that is not worth a lawsuit, you may want to file a complaint against them.

Professionals who are licensed have an agency that oversees those licenses and fields complaints. For attorneys, it’s the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (www.iardc.org). For many other professionals, the Illinois Department of Professional Regulation is the place to go to file a formal complaint (www.idfpr.com). You can also look up the status of a professional license on these sites to see whether a person you’re thinking of hiring has been disciplined in the past.

One of the best ways to avoid getting into a situation like this is to do a lot of research on the front end. Before hiring someone, check them out, get references and ask around. Meet with them to see if you like their approach and feel comfortable with their personality and skill set.

Father’s Rights Don’t Require “Specialized” Attorney

Monday, May 23rd, 2011

Father’s rights attorneys claim to have special experience in, or aptitude for, representing fathers in divorce and custody cases. Or at least that is the implication. It suggests that fathers have different rights or less rights or that they aren’t well represented by a family law attorney who represents both mothers and fathers. This is completely false, in our opinion.

Divorce and custody cases are stressful, personal and emotional. An attorney who advertises as a “father’s rights” attorney is preying on the vulnerability of parents who are scared and uncertain of the future. It also gives the impression that a certain lawyer is a good fit for you simply because you are a father.  It’s misleading. Fathers don’t need father’s rights attorneys – they need good family law attorneys, period. Parents both have the right to seek custody of their children. Both are entitled to visitation. Each is obligated to support their child or children.

We’re not saying the attorneys who advertise as fathers’ rights attorneys are not good at what they do. We simply don’t agree with using this tactic to attract clients. It suggests a “specialty” that, in our opinion, doesn’t exist. The truth is that fathers – and mothers – should focus on finding an experienced, compassionate and knowledgeable attorney to represent them.

If you are looking for a family law attorney, ask your friends, get a referral, look online for client reviews, and interview more than one before you hire someone. Set up an initial consultation and ask a lot of questions about their experience with similar cases. Ask if they focus on family law. And ask about their strategy in cases like yours. Follow your gut feeling, too. If it doesn’t feel like a good fit, or if you aren’t confident in the attorney’s skills or experience, keep looking.


FindGreatLawyers.com