FindGreatLawyers.com is a unique service. We are Illinois attorneys who since 2001 have focused our practice on helping people...

Illinois Lawyer Referrals and Legal Guidance

Archive for March, 2011

Anonymous Juries

Tuesday, March 22nd, 2011

Judges in both state and federal courts are allowed to declare an anonymous jury if there is a reason to believe the jurors could be in danger if their names were made public (terrorism, organized crime) or to prevent jury tampering by protecting jurors from the media or members of the public who might contact or harass them.

Anonymous juries have been in the news in Chicago recently. Federal prosecutors in Chicago want an anonymous jury in the upcoming trial of an alleged terrorist, for the safety of the jurors. Also, the judge in the Blagojevich case recently declared that the identities of the jurors in the retrial will remain secret until after the verdict. The purpose in the Blagojevich trial is to protect jurors from media harassment. As it stands now, the judge says names can be released eight hours after the verdict is read, although Blagojevich is arguing the names should never be released.

Anonymous juries are somewhat controversial. One problem is the message it sends to the jurors. Take the terrorism case, for example. If you were told you were serving on an anonymous jury, you might make assumptions about the defendant. If the judge was taking steps to protect you from them or the people they associate with, you might start off with the impression that they are a dangerous criminal. Judges can attempt to avoid this bias by giving a neutral reason why the jury is being kept secret, but it might still have an impact.

Another argument against anonymous juries is that it gets in the way of the process of interviewing and choosing jurors. If the jurors are answering questions anonymously, some say it’s less effective and jurors can be dishonest. Although you can also argue jurors are going to be more honest if answering questions anonymously.

And it’s no surprise that the media doesn’t like anonymous juries. They argue that this information should be made public, and that jurors can be held more accountable when their identities are known.

I’m not sure what the right balance is, but protecting jurors from threats and harassment is a compelling argument for anonymity. It’s one of those situations where you can’t fully protect both sides. The question is what’s more important – the safety of the jurors or a fair trial for the defendant?

Missing a court date can mess up your court case.

Monday, March 21st, 2011

Skipping a court date, especially your first date for appearing on the case, can put your whole case at risk. You take the chance that you will have a default judgment entered against you, which means you’ve lost your case before you’ve even gotten started.

In one case, a defendant learned this the hard way. He was served with a summons in the lawsuit, which gave him a date to appear in court. Before the court date, he and the plaintiff’s lawyers spoke to try to work out a settlement for the matter. Once they reach a settlement, the plaintiff’s lawyers told the defendant that he did not need to go to court on his court date.

briefcaseRelying on their advice, he didn’t show up for his court date, and a judgment of default was entered against him for failing to appear in court. It may have seemed reasonable at the time, that since there was a settlement the lawsuit was over and he didn’t have to go to court. But relying on someone else’s lawyer, especially about something as significant as missing a court date, is not a good idea.

If you are given a date to appear in court, you should always be there, regardless of how meaningless you may think the time will be. Depending on what the court date is for, the judge can take some action against you in the case if you do not show up to represent your interests.

In the case of this defendant’s default judgment, he can go to court and try to have it reversed. He will need to act quickly and file a motion within 30 days of the default. It’s pretty likely the motion will be successful in re-opening the lawsuit. But why take the chance to have to fix something that doesn’t need to be broken in the first place.

Rely on your own best judgment, and not the other side’s lawyers. They may be perfectly good and honest, but they are not representing your interests. Even if you think you have a settlement and the case will be over, remember—it’s not over until it’s over. Just because someone says it is, until the court dismisses the case, you still need to follow the procedure.

When money won’t help…injunctions.

Friday, March 18th, 2011

When money won’t help…injunctions.

Sometimes you have a case where winning money won’t completely fix your problem.  You need to have the judge order someone to do something or to stop doing something.  These are injunctions, and can be granted by the judge very quickly, if necessary.

There are three kinds of injunctions available.  Temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions are issued for a short period of time, and help to address a problem faster, until there can be a full trial on the matter.  A permanent injunction can then be issued, resolving the matter fully.

Temporary Restraining Orders and Preliminary Injunctions

Both of these are issued for a specific period of time.  They are designed to either preserve the present state of affairs—the status quo– or to prevent something from happening.  A full trial on the merits of your case hasn’t happened yet, but you need to have an order that would protect your interests until that happens.

Temporary restraining orders can be granted in emergency situations even without notice to the other party.  If you can show the judge that letting the defendant know you are asking for it would cause the kind of harm you’re trying to prevent, then you may be able to get the order without notice.

Here’s an example:  If you’re a business owner and you have good reason to believe that an employee is going to quit and take confidential client lists and information to another employer, you would need to act fast and prevent this from happening.

You could go into court right away to ask for an emergency temporary restraining order, without giving notice to the employee.  You would explain to the judge that if the employee knew that you were going to try to stop him, he could give out your confidential information to a competitor before the hearing date.  By the time the hearing date came, it would be too late.

A ten-day temporary restraining order could be issued, preventing your employee from using or disclosing your information, and setting a date for a preliminary injunction.

During the hearing on the preliminary injunction, the issues can be explored further, and the employee would have a chance to defend against the need for the injunction.

To get a preliminary injunction that would continue to protect your rights or interests, you would have to show:

1.  You have a clear right in need of protection.   You would show that you have a definite protectable interest, whether it is related to your business, your property, or your safety, or some other area.  In this case, it is your confidential client list and information.  You may have spent considerable time and creativity building this information, which gives you a competitive advantage.

2.  You would be harmed irreparably if you didn’t get the injunction.  Show what would likely follow from your interest not being protected.  Here, once the confidential information is made public, it can’t be “un-done.”

3.  Money or other legal actions won’t help you.  If your safety is at issue, clearly preventing it is better than paying for it.  Or if an asset of yours would be lost which can’t really be quantified, then it is better to protect it.

4.  You are more likely than not going to win once you have a full trial.  At this stage, since it’s still temporary, you don’t have to completely prove your case, but you do have to show it’s a good one.

5.  If the other factors are there, then you also should show that you would be hurt more by not having the injunction than the defendant would be hurt if you did have the injunction.

Before issuing an injunction, the court may require a bond to be given, which would be an amount of money to cover costs and harm to the defendant if the injunction is found to have been wrongly ordered.

Permanent Injunctions

A permanent injunction accomplishes basically the same purpose as the preliminary injunction—it maintains a status quo by ordering someone to do or not do something.  It is issued, though, after a full trial on the merits of the case.

The factors to get a permanent injunction are mostly the same as well:  you have to show your right to be protected; the harm that will come if you don’t get the injunction that is irreparable; and that you can’t fix the harm with money or other relief.  For the permanent injunction, though, you have to prove your case on the merits.

Once a permanent injunction is ordered by the court, it continues in effect unless it is changed by another order of court. It has to be followed by everyone that has knowledge of the injunction.  For example, if the employee is restrained from taking and disclosing your confidential business information, he could be held in contempt of court for violating the order.  If his future employer knows of the injunction, he or she could also be in contempt of court for using the information.

Injunctions are frequently used in divorce cases to protect the marital property, to ensure children are not taken out of the state, to decide on exclusive use of the home, and other such issues.   They can be a very useful tool, including the emergency temporary restraining orders, to provide protection during the divorce.

There are many other situations as well, where this kind of court action can help someone in need of protection, when money alone won’t take care of it.

Private conversations that are privileged and may stay private.

Thursday, March 17th, 2011

Some conversations are so important to have, that the law protects them from being repeated and used to hurt you.  Illinois law identifies some relationships that need private communication in order to be able to provide an important function.  In each of these relationships, the communications have some privilege against being forced to be disclosed.  Some of the more common relationships where communications may be privileged are:

Husband and Wife: Communication between spouses is such a fundamental part of the family relationship, that all marital conversations are presumed to be privileged.  Husbands and wives are allowed to testify in court for or against each other, but they cannot be forced to testify about any conversation between them, or any statements or comments made by one to the other.  The protection for the marital conversations starts when the marriage starts, so it does not protect communication from before the couple was married.

There are some exceptions to this privilege.  One spouse can waive the privilege as to his or her own statements, which would allow the other to testify about them.  Also, in any court case between the spouses, or cases involving the interests of their children, either spouse can testify about the marital communications.

Physician and Patient: In order to best protect our health, we need to be able to be very open with our doctors, and tell them everything about our medical history and current symptoms and issues.  Illinois law protects communication from the patient to the physician, so that you don’t have to worry that being honest with your doctor can hurt you later.

Physicians and surgeons are forbidden from disclosing any information or communications that come from their professional relationships with their patients.  Casual conversations would not necessarily be privileged, but conversations that are related to diagnosing or treating patients should be.

Conversations with rape crisis counselors are also confidential, as are dental records.

The privilege belongs to the patient, so that the patient can allow the doctor to disclose something that would otherwise be protected.  There are some other exceptions also, where conversations can be disclosed.  One example is if a therapist believes that disclosing a communication with a patient is necessary to protect someone from an immediate and serious harm.  Also, in some cases where a defendant’s physical and mental condition is an issue, such as a DUI, some statements related to that condition may be allowed in court.

Attorney and Client: The communications between attorneys and their clients are generally protected as confidential.  People with legal problems and questions need to be able get help from their attorneys without fear that their opponent could use the information in a case against them.  Attorneys can’t represent their clients in the most effective way if they don’t know all the facts about a situation—no matter how bad the facts may seem to their client’s interests.

For a communication with an attorney to be protected, it has to be directed specifically to receiving legal advice.  Also, the circumstances of the conversation have to be confidential.  If there are other people listening, it is not a confidential communication.  Since it is the client’s right to keep the communications private, he or she can also waive the privilege.  The client can ask the attorney to disclose the communication.  Or the client can reveal the communication and end the confidentiality.

In some instances where the attorney needs to disclose parts of communications that are necessary to protect his or her own interests, it can be allowed.  This can happen, for example, in a case against a client to collect unpaid attorney’s fees.

Clergy or Spiritual Advisor: Illinois law protects the privacy of the relationship between clergy members, and the individuals that come to them to for spiritual guidance.  If a confession or admission is made to a minister of a religion while he or she is meeting with that person professionally, then the statements are privileged and neither person can be forced to disclose them.

Illinois attorney- challenging a will

Wednesday, March 16th, 2011

Every Wednesday we offer five legal tips.  Today’s tips are an overview of challenging a will in Illinois.

1.  What it means-In Illinois, a will may be challenged in what is called a “will contest.”  Within six months of a will being admitted to probate, you can file a petition to object to the will’s being admitted.  If you have any interest in the estate, you can challenge the will based on evidence that it is not a valid will.

2.  Why challenge? If you have reason to believe that the will is not in fact the actual, valid will of the person who signed it, you may want to challenge it.  Contrary to popular belief, a will contest is not a forum for a relative who is unhappy with the will to argue why it should be different.  If a parent chose to leave a more substantial bequest to one child over another, this is not in itself an invalid will, unless there is proof that it was not the parent’s actual, valid will.

3.  What are reasons for challenging? There are several reasons that a will can be declared invalid, based on the making and signing of the will, including:

  • the person who signed it was not mentally competent at the time, and did not know what he or she was doing;
  • the will was not properly signed or witnessed according to Illinois law;
  • there was fraud or duress involved, and therefore the bequests were not really those of the person making the will; and
  • the will is not the most current one, and had been revoked.

4.  What happens if the challenge is successful? A will contest is not an action against a person, but rather to show the will itself is invalid.  If the challenge succeeds, then the will is not admitted to probate, and a prior, valid will may be probated.  If there is no prior will, then the estate can be distributed according to Illinois’ intestate laws of distribution, which governs when someone dies without a will.

5.  What is a “no contest clause?” Sometimes when a person is making a will, he or she may anticipate that there is a relative that might be likely to incorrectly claim that the will is not valid.  A provision can be added to the will which says that if someone contests the will and is unsuccessful, then they will forfeit whatever bequest was supposed to be given to them from that will.  Will contests are usually difficult to win anyway, so the presence of a no contest clause may be a deterrent to challenging a will.

Who is the best workers’ compensation attorney in Illinois?

Tuesday, March 15th, 2011

We hear this question a lot, and our answer is always the same. There’s no such thing. There are some excellent workers’ compensation attorneys in Illinois, but who is the “best” depends on the client, the attorney and the injury.

When looking for an Illinois workers’ comp attorney, one of the first things you should do is narrow the list to attorneys who focus their practice on helping injured workers. This means that they handle workers’ compensation claims day in and day out. I’m not saying they can never take on another type of case, but the majority of their cases should be in this category.

Also, look at how long they’ve been practicing. We almost always recommend attorneys with at least ten years of experience. If you have a unique injury or a very serious one, you might want to look for an attorney who has successfully handled similar cases in the past. Another thing to look at is whether they are familiar with the arbitrators who make the decisions in workers’ comp cases. Hiring an attorney who has a positive relationship with your arbitrator can make a difference.

Beyond that, you have to rely on your gut. Meet with a potential attorney, ask a lot of questions, answer their questions, and see what you think. If you don’t trust them or don’t have confidence in their ability to represent you, keep looking. You don’t have to hire the first attorney you meet, or the second, or even the third.

When a pharmacy in Illinois gives you the wrong medicine

Monday, March 14th, 2011

A woman in the early weeks of pregnancy was recently given the wrong bottle of medication.  It was a prescription meant for another woman.  Both women had similar names, but the similarity ends there.  The pregnant woman was filling a prescription for an antibiotic, and the other prescription was for methotrexate—a medication usually given to treat cancer.  

One medication is safe for a pregnant woman to take.  The other medication, which the pharmacy gave her, is meant to attack clusters of cells in the body, and could potentially cause a serious risk to her pregnancy, and serious harm to her fetus. 

The pregnant woman took the pills given to her by the pharmacy, and after they made her feel ill, she found out that something was wrong with the prescription.  She was rushed to the hospital, but the methotrexate was in her system already. 

Now all she can do is wait and worry:  worry about the fate of the pregnancy; worry about whether her baby will have birth defects and other serious medical issues. 

Unfortunately pharmacy mix-ups like this one happen more frequently than we would care to think about.  There are several avenues of dangerous mistakes that can happen at the pharmacy.  The wrong dose or dosing instructions could be given; the wrong medication can be filled in your bottle; or like this situation, you can be given someone else’s prescription. 

The damage caused by these mistakes can be serious.  And the pharmacy should be responsible for its negligence in causing the damage.   The pharmacy owes a duty to its customers to provide the medication as prescribed by the doctor, and to have it properly labeled.  When a pharmacy breaches that duty and the medication given to you makes you sick or causes other harm to you because of that mistake, the pharmacy should pay for harm it caused. 

Where a pregnancy is involved, there is even more potential for harm.  A medication taken in error can physically hurt the woman who took it, it can hurt the fetus, and it can cause emotional distress during the remainder of the pregnancy. 

The woman in this case that wrongly ingested methotrexate is apparently doing fine physically.  But the pharmacy has created a situation where she has to wait and worry about the health of her pregnancy, and what harm may have come to her fetus.  Where someone’s negligence causes such severe emotional trauma, even without physical harm there can be responsibility for the damage caused. 

Some may try to say that she is partially responsible for this situation by not noticing that the prescription had the wrong name on it.  As painful as this is, since this likely will not be the last time a pharmacy makes a mistake, we need to learn from this and take steps to help ourselves.  A few simple precautionary measures can save us a world of pain and heartache:  

            (1) Talk to your doctor about the medication that he or she is prescribing.  Ask questions about the name, dose, purpose, quantity, and other information, so you will be informed before you arrive at the pharmacy.

            (2)  Before you leave the pharmacy, look everything over.  See that the prescription and instructions match what your doctor described to you.  Be sure the prescription was meant for you.  If it is a medication you have taken before and it looks different, ask the pharmacist about it. 

If the child is damaged, the mom will likely have a significant lawsuit to bring on her baby’s behalf.  We have helped many people in those types of situations.  It’s all about damages.  Clearly the pharmacy is negligent, but if there is not harm to the child there will not be much of a case.


FindGreatLawyers.com