FindGreatLawyers.com is a unique service. We are Illinois attorneys who since 2001 have focused our practice on helping people...

Illinois Lawyer Referrals and Legal Guidance

Archive for July, 2010

Five tips on winning an Illinois legal malpractice lawsuit

Wednesday, July 21st, 2010

Every Wednesday we provide five legal tips on various areas of Illinois law based on questions we have received from readers.  Today’s tips are on five things you need to do to win a legal malpractice lawsuit.

1. You have to sue your attorney on time.  Generally speaking you have two years from the date you knew or reasonably should have known malpractice occurred to file a suit.  Even if you didn’t know it happened, a case must be filed within six years of the negligence.  If you wait too long it is barred forever.

2. You need an expert (usually another attorney) to say that the first lawyer was negligent.  This is typically something the lawyer you hire will find for you.

3. You need to prove that had the first lawyer done everything correctly you would have won your case.  It’s not enough that they screw up, you have to show that their negligence caused you a harm you wouldn’t have otherwise suffered.

4. You need to show actual damages.  If your lawyer messed up causing you to lose your case, you still must prove what the harm was that you suffered.  Otherwise bringing a lawsuit isn’t worth it.

5. You must show that the lawyer’s screw up was actual negligence and not just awful customer service.  If it was just a matter that they didn’t return your calls for months they should lose their license.  But bad service does not equal a successful malpractice lawsuit without something more.

Since 2001, findgreatlawyers.com has been the leading resource for Illinois attorney referrals and legal guidance. If you would like our help please contact one of our lawyers via our on-line form or call (800) 517-1614. We are based in Chicago, but help people find attorneys for legal matters throughout Illinois.  All inquiries are free and confidential.

My ex has someone else now so I don’t want to pay

Tuesday, July 20th, 2010

In Illinois, spousal support/alimony is called maintenance. It is an amount of money that one spouse pays the other during and after divorce. Sometimes, the court decides how much maintenance is paid. Other times, the parties come to an agreement.   It typically happens when one spouse earned much more than the other.  It also typically ends when you re-marry or get a “roommate” that is just like a spouse.

Maintenance can be temporary – during the divorce process – or more permanent. Although it can continue indefinitely, spousal support usually has an end. The support order from the judge, or the agreement signed by the parties, often lays out the specifics.

Maintenance can end on a specific date, such as three years after the divorce is finalized. Sometimes, maintenance continues until a certain event. For example, if the purpose of maintenance is to support the former spouse while they become financially independent, it may end when they become fully employed.

Regardless of what an agreement might say, in Illinois, certain events usually terminate maintenance — death, remarriage or cohabitation.

“Cohabitation” is often disputed because the definition is fairly vague. Basically, cohabitation is living with someone in a continuing, conjugal way. “Conjugal” means marriage-like, but it doesn’t necessarily have to be a sexual relationship. The idea is that if your ex is sharing living expenses with another person, then they probably don’t need maintenance any longer. The courts look at whether there are joint bank accounts and credit cards, whether living expenses are shared, and the type of relationship the two people share.

In some cases, simply having a roommate can end maintenance. Again, the courts are usually focused on the financial situation of the person receiving maintenance. The purpose of spousal support is often to help the lesser-earning spouse get on their feet, and if they are sharing expenses with another person, the court may decide they no longer need the maintenance payments.

If you are seeking to end payments based on cohabitation of your ex, you will have to prove that the living arrangement is the type that will end spousal support. Don’t make the decision yourself and simply stop paying, even if it seems crystal clear. In most cases, you aren’t officially off the hook until a judge says so. So get into court and have your maintenance obligation formally terminated.

Since 2001, findgreatlawyers.com has been the leading resource for Illinois attorney referrals and legal guidance. If you would like our help please contact one of our lawyers via our on-line form or call (800) 517-1614. We are based in Chicago, but help people find attorneys for legal matters throughout Illinois.  All inquiries are free and confidential.

Bar attorneys: Perception vs. Reality in hiring a lawyer

Monday, July 19th, 2010

I don’t know if there is an official count, but there are countless “Bar” associations in Illinois.  Off the top of my head: Chicago, Illinois, Cook County, South Suburban, Lake County, Northwest, DuPage, Will, Gay,Hispanic, Women, Asian, Workers Comp, Divorce, Collections, Peoria, Urbana, Decatur, Kane, Winnebago, Puerto Rican, Helenic, Arab-American, Italian, Muslin, North Suburban, American Bar and Appellate Lawyers.

What do all of these have in common?  Pretty much any attorney who is willing to pay the member dues can join.  The best of attorneys, the worst, average, they are all welcome.

Bar Associations can serve a great purpose for networking, education, socializing, philanthropy and discussion.  Probably like anything else in life, if you are a member you get out of it what you put in to it.

But when it comes to hiring a lawyer, the fact that an attorney is or isn’t a member one of these groups is pretty much irrelevant.  You don’t get any extra credit for being a member and it doesn’t mean you are a better or worse attorney if you belong to one of these.

Full disclosure.  I have been a lawyer since 1997 and have been a member of many of these groups and many of the attorneys that we suggest are leaders in some of these Associations.

There is a lot that should go in to your thought process when you consider hiring an attorney.  Their practice focus, experience, location, success record, cost, etc.  But if you are hiring a lawyer because they decided to join a club you are doing nothing more than giving yourself false assurance.

Since 2001, findgreatlawyers.com has been the leading resource for Illinois attorney referrals and legal guidance. If you would like our help please contact one of our lawyers via our on-line form or call (800) 517-1614. We are based in Chicago, but help people find attorneys for legal matters throughout Illinois.  All inquiries are free and confidential.

Three reasons an attorney may turn down a medical malpractice case

Friday, July 16th, 2010

 

Attorneys don’t take every case that comes in the door, not even when it comes to medical malpractice. The myth is that these cases are worth a lot of money, however many of them aren’t worth much at all. Here are some reasons why.

Bad result, but no negligence

Just because you were injured while being treated by a doctor doesn’t mean you have a medical malpractice case. To be successful you need to prove negligence. This means that the healthcare provider fell below the standard of care. For example, if your doctor prescribed a medication and you had a severe allergic reaction, you may not have a case. Unless the doctor knew, or should have known, about your allergy, then they weren’t negligent and there probably isn’t any liability on their part. The same is true for side effects of a surgery, medication or other treatment. A bad side effect, even if it causes injury, isn’t necessarily negligence. This is generally true regardless of whether the doctor warned you about the particular side effect you experienced.

No significant and permanent injury

Take the same example above. Let’s say the doctor knew you were allergic, and it was written in your chart, but they gave you the medication anyway. If you have a severe reaction but later recover, you’ll have a hard time finding an attorney to take your case. Even if your reaction to the medication was life threatening, if it didn’t cause any permanent damage you probably shouldn’t waste your time suing. Medical malpractice cases are expensive for attorneys to pursue – they pay all the costs upfront, including fees for medical experts. So unless you have a significant and permanent injury, an attorney may turn down your case, even if the negligence is clear.

An elderly victim

Same example. Let’s say an 85-year-old man was suffering from an aggressive form of cancer. While in the hospital, the doctor prescribes a medicine despite a known and documented allergy. If the man dies as a result, many attorneys would turn down the case based on his age. Even though there was negligence, and the outcome was obviously permanent, you would have a hard time recovering much in damages. This is because the value of the case is low – you have an elderly man with a poor quality of life due to his serious illness. It’s sad and unfair, but it’s a reality in medical malpractice.

A lot goes into determining whether you have a medical malpractice case worth pursuing. You may not have a case, but don’t make an assumption. An experienced medical malpractice attorney is in the best position help you make such an important decision.

Since 2001, findgreatlawyers.com has been the leading resource for Illinois attorney referrals and legal guidance. If you would like our help please contact one of our lawyers via our on-line form or call (800) 517-1614. We are based in Chicago, but help people find attorneys for legal matters throughout Illinois.  All inquiries are free and confidential.

Does my father owe me back child support?

Thursday, July 15th, 2010

We’re often asked by adult children whether they can collect child support from a parent who never paid when they were growing up. It’s not an easy question to answer. In some cases, back child support is collectible, but there are several variables to keep in mind:

-          It depends on whether there was a child support order from a judge. If so, it’s probably enforceable. There’s generally no deadline in Illinois for collecting on a support order, no matter how old the child is.  Once the order is in place it is there until it is changed.  A parent that tries to delay their obligation only adds interest to what they owe.

-          The parent, not the child, has to petition the court. So if you grew up living with your mother and want to collect back payment from your father, your mother is the one who has to pursue it. She is the only one who can collect the back payments.

-          If you are in college, or about to be, your custodial parent may be able to get child support for your college expenses. A judge will consider the income of the parents, the availability of loans and scholarships, as well as the education plans of the child in making a decision. Every case is different.

If you are an adult child and you believe your mother/father owes back child support, or should be helping out with college, the parent who was ordered to receive the payments must petition the court. We almost always suggest hiring an experienced attorney to help with this, particularly someone who focuses their practice on family law and handles child support issues every day.

Since 2001, findgreatlawyers.com has been the leading resource for Illinois attorney referrals and legal guidance. If you would like our help please contact one of our lawyers via our on-line form or call (800) 517-1614. We are based in Chicago, but help people find attorneys for legal matters throughout Illinois.  All inquiries are free and confidential.

Illinois legal advice for probate

Wednesday, July 14th, 2010

Every Wednesday we provide five legal tips based on questions we have received from callers on various areas of Illinois law.  This week’s tips focus on probate law which is the process of transferring a person’s property/assets/possessions upon their death.

1. Time: The probate process, by law, takes at least six months from the day that the will is filed.  This is allowed for anyone who may want to challenge a will to come forward as well as for creditors to make claims that they are owed money.  Most probate cases take 12-18 months.  Even if you know that you are the only heir to an estate you can’t get around this rule.

2. No will: If a person dies without a will it means that they have died intestate.  No matter your relationship with the deceased or even if you know what the deceased wanted to happen, the law will trump all of that.  If you die without a will and have a spouse and kids, half goes to the spouse, half to the kids.   If there is no spouse then the kids all share equally.  From there it could go on to surviving parents or siblings.  Making a will takes very little time and can avoid all of these problems.

3. Power of Attorney: A lot of people that contact us think that because they had a power of attorney over the deceased, they can make all of the decisions once that person has passed.  That is simply not true.  A power of attorney ends when the person dies.

4. Avoiding probate: If you want to avoid probate court when you die, you can put things in a trust which a is a legal document that will allow you to maintain control of what you have, but automatically pass it on when you die.  That can still be challenged in court, but does not require anyone to file in court.  In addition, if you put someone on your bank account or home, those can also avoid probate.

5. Challenging a will: You can’t challenge a will because you aren’t happy with what it says or don’t think it’s fair.  You can challenge if you have proof that the person who signed it was not mentally competent when they did it (e.g. they were on their death bed pumped with drugs), it’s not a valid will (e.g. not properly witnessed), it was made under duress or you have a more current will that trumps the one that has been presented.  These are not easy cases to win, but if you have the evidence in your favor it can happen.

Since 2001, findgreatlawyers.com has been the leading resource for Illinois attorney referrals and legal guidance. If you would like our help please contact one of our lawyers via our on-line form or call (800) 517-1614. We are based in Chicago, but help people find attorneys for legal matters throughout Illinois.  All inquiries are free and confidential.

You can’t always sue to solve a problem

Tuesday, July 13th, 2010

I hear from a lot of people who want to sue because they are being treated unfairly. These questions come up in a variety of situations, from HOA rules to city ordinances to statewide laws. Whether you have a problem with the rule itself, or you feel the rule is being unfairly applied, you probably don’t have a case.

If you are a small business owner and the city denies an important permit, or fines you for a violation you feel is wrong, a lawsuit isn’t the way to go.

If your homeowner’s association won’t let you paint your front door but your neighbor was able to paint their door, you probably won’t get anywhere by suing the association.

If you didn’t know that you couldn’t talk on your cell phone while driving in the city of Chicago because you’re from out of town, you can’t sue because you’re mad that you got a ticket.

There is a misconception that you can always sue someone for doing something you think is “wrong.” These situations may seem unfair and be completely frustrating, but a lawsuit isn’t going to help.

We’re not saying there’s nothing you can do. You can always try contesting a ticket, talking to the city about your permit or fines, or working with your HOA to reach a compromise. It’s easier said than done, of course. But it may be your only option.

Would you pay a lawyer to sue out of principle?

Let’s say you got ripped off in a scam. You bought a new home and later found out that the builder cut corners and failed to get proper permits and inspections. It cost you $15,000 to fix the shoddy work. You know who the person is who scammed you, and you know you could prove it. Should you sue? It seems like an easy decision – yes. But what if it would cost you more than $15,000 in fees to win at trial? What if it would cost $20,000? Would you still sue? Probably not.

Unfortunately, this is a common problem. Civil attorneys usually charge an hourly fee for small cases ($15,000 is considered “small” in terms of a lawsuit). You may have to put down a $2,500 retainer, from which the attorney will take an hourly fee as it’s earned. You may have to refill the retainer several times by the time you get through filing a lawsuit, conducting an investigation and finally get to the trial. And trial preparation may cost even more. So it’s entirely possible that it would cost you more to sue than you lost in the first place. Is it worth the money to sue the developer out of principle? Most people would probably say no.

It seems unfair that you can lose thousands of dollars and have no recourse, or no reasonable recourse, available. But that’s how our legal system works. And unless things change – and we don’t see that happening anytime soon – our system will continue to shut people out.

Since 2001, findgreatlawyers.com has been the leading resource for Illinois attorney referrals and legal guidance. If you would like our help please contact one of our lawyers via our on-line form or call (800) 517-1614. We are based in Chicago, but help people find attorneys for legal matters throughout Illinois.  All inquiries are free and confidential.


FindGreatLawyers.com